DE

glossary entry

What is an Impendiment?

An impediment is any obstacle that prevents a Scrum or agile team from making progress toward its goals. Impediments can arise on different levels: within the team, in the organizational environment, or through external dependencies. Typical examples include technical problems, unclear requirements, conflicts within the team, or organizational bottlenecks such as missing decisions. 

 

 

Practical Relevance 

- Team Level: Impediments slow down delivery and reduce predictability. 

- Organizational Level: Unresolved impediments highlight systemic weaknesses (e.g., decision-making speed, resource allocation). 

- Transparency: Identifying impediments makes visible where an organization must adapt to enable agility. 

 

 

Real-World Examples 

- Technical: Build pipelines frequently fail, preventing developers from integrating their code. 

- Organizational: A team waits weeks for approval from another department before they can move forward. 

- Team Dynamics: A conflict between two team members causes delays in collaboration. 

- External Dependency: A supplier does not deliver a critical component on time, blocking further progress. 

  

 

Implementation in Practice 

- Identification: Impediments are often raised in Daily Scrums, Retrospectives, or via transparent boards. 

- Ownership: While the team highlights impediments, responsibility for resolving them usually lies with the Scrum Master or leadership roles. 

- Resolution: Impediments should be systematically analyzed, prioritized, and resolved as early as possible. 

- Escalation: If the team cannot remove an impediment itself, it should be escalated promptly to management. 

- Tracking: Many teams maintain an Impediment Backlog to document, prioritize, and monitor resolution progress. 

 

 

Anti-Patterns 

- Ignoring impediments: Teams raise issues during Daily Scrums or Retrospectives, but nothing happens afterward. The same problems resurface week after week, causing frustration and undermining trust in the process. 

- Scrum Master as the only problem solver: A Scrum Master who takes on every impediment themselves creates dependency. Their role is to facilitate ownership, escalate when needed, and encourage the team and leadership to share responsibility. 

- No escalation path: Some impediments require action beyond the team’s influence (e.g., missing management decisions, infrastructure investments). Without a clear escalation mechanism, systemic issues remain unresolved. 

- Confusing impediments with daily challenges: Not every inconvenience qualifies as an impediment. Teams must distinguish between background noise (e.g., a temporarily slow laptop) and genuine blockers that stop progress. 

- Treating impediments as private complaints: If issues are hidden in side conversations instead of being made visible (e.g., via an Impediment Board), they won’t be addressed systematically. 

- Lack of prioritization: Treating all impediments as equally urgent means that critical blockers are drowned out by minor issues. A structured prioritization (e.g., impact vs. urgency) is needed. 

- Symptom fixing instead of root cause analysis: Teams sometimes address only the surface problem (e.g., adding more staff to handle workload) without resolving the underlying cause (e.g., high WIP limits, poor flow). 

- Blame culture around impediments: If raising impediments leads to finger-pointing or punishment, team members will stop reporting them. A healthy culture treats impediments as opportunities for improvement, not as personal failures. 

 

 

CALADE Perspective 

At CALADE, impediments are seen as valuable signals for systemic improvement. Removing them is not only about supporting a single team but about identifying structural weaknesses in processes, governance, or culture. We help organizations create clear ownership models for impediments, establish impediment backlogs, and ensure leadership actively participates in resolving systemic blockers. 

 

 

Related Terms 

- Scrum Master – role that supports impediment resolution 

- Retrospective – event for reflecting on process improvements 

- Continuous Improvement (Kaizen) – mindset of addressing obstacles continuously 

- Organizational Debt – systemic shortcomings that can create repeated impediments 

← back to list