Business Process Redesign (BPR) is a radical, strategy-driven approach to fundamentally rethinking and transforming end-to-end business processes. Popularized in the early 1990s by Michael Hammer and James Champy (Reengineering the Corporation, 1993), BPR focuses on breakthrough performance in cost, quality, speed, and service. Unlike continuous improvement methods (e.g., Kaizen), BPR does not merely optimize existing processes but re-creates them from scratch to meet new strategic objectives.
Origin and Concept
BPR emerged when organizations faced massive performance gaps due to globalization, deregulation, and rapid technological change. Hammer and Champy argued that automating existing workflows was insufficient; instead, companies should discard outdated assumptions and design processes anew. The aim: dramatic, not incremental, improvements.
Key Phases of the BPR explained
The accompanying figure illustrates a widely used four-phase model of BPR:
1. Define Scope and Objectives
Teams clarify why change is needed and which value streams are critical. Early warning signs—conflicts, unproductive meetings, unstructured communication, strategic drift—indicate redesign potential.
2. Redesign the Process Structure
Focusing on critical success factors and efficiency, processes are mapped and reinvented. This phase includes setting performance benchmarks and incorporating customer-centric design.
3. Introduce Management Practices
New management tools, measurement systems, and compensation mechanisms are defined to reinforce the redesigned processes and align leadership behavior.
4. Implement and Integrate
The redesigned processes are rolled out, supported by change management, and stabilized through feedback loops and continuous learning.
The figure shows these steps and their key elements at a glance, providing an easy visual roadmap for complex BPR initiatives.
Practical Relevance
BPR remains highly relevant in the era of digital transformation and disruptive markets. Typical triggers include:
· Strategic repositioning: entering new markets or radically changing the business model.
· Digital transformation: integrating new technologies (e.g., AI, cloud) to enable entirely new processes.
· Cost and quality pressures: when incremental lean improvements are no longer enough.
Extensive studies (e.g., MIT Sloan Management Review) show that organizations applying BPR can achieve productivity gains of 30–50 % in critical value streams if implementation is rigorous and leadership is committed.
Implementation in Practice
BPR is not a one-time workshop but a structured program:
· Preparation and diagnostics: identify core processes, quantify gaps, secure executive sponsorship.
· Vision and redesign: assemble cross-functional teams to challenge assumptions and create breakthrough designs.
· Prototyping and piloting: test new workflows in controlled environments to validate assumptions.
· Roll-out and stabilization: integrate new processes with IT systems, governance, and HR structures; monitor KPIs to ensure sustainability.
Effective BPR combines hard factors (IT architecture, performance metrics) with soft factors (culture, leadership, communication). Without cultural alignment, even technically perfect processes fail.
Real-World Examples
Automotive supplier: Rebuilt the entire order-to-delivery process to integrate real-time supplier data. Lead time dropped from weeks to days; inventory costs fell by double digits.
International bank: Redesigned credit approval from a paper-heavy, multi-step sequence into a digital, parallel workflow. Loan turnaround time was cut by more than 60 %.
Healthcare network: Reengineered patient admission and discharge processes, aligning electronic health records with new care pathways. This reduced patient wait times by over 40 % and improved clinical outcomes.
These examples demonstrate how radical end-to-end redesign—rather than isolated fixes—delivers measurable strategic impact.
Limitations, Weaknesses, and Criticism
Despite its potential, BPR faces well-documented challenges:
· High disruption risk: large organizational shifts can create resistance, morale issues, and temporary productivity loss.
· Resource intensity: BPR demands significant investment of time, budget, and leadership attention.
· Knowledge drain: discarding old processes may also discard valuable implicit knowledge.
· Over-engineering: without clear strategic focus, BPR can become an academic exercise detached from customer value.
· Mixed success rates: studies indicate that 50 % or more of BPR programs fail to meet their objectives, often due to weak change management.
CALADE Perspective
At CALADE we view BPR as a catalyst for holistic transformation. We rarely apply BPR as a “big bang” in isolation. Instead, we blend it with agile methods, iterative Transformation Increments, and a strong people focus. Our approach helps clients achieve deep, sustainable redesign while keeping employees engaged and risks manageable. We use the figure’s four phases as an orientation framework, but enrich each stage with modern tools such as design thinking, value-stream mapping, and adaptive change facilitation. This integrated perspective allows organizations to translate BPR’s bold goals into lasting business value.
Related Terms
· Business Process Management (BPM)
· Lean Management
· Digital Transformation
· Change Management
· Value Stream Mapping
← back to list