Risk ROAMing is a method from the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) for identifying, classifying, and transparently managing risks in large planning events such as PI Planning.
"ROAM" is an acronym for four possible states of risk:
• Resolved
• Owned (someone takes responsibility)
• Accepted (consciously accepted)
• Mitigated (reduced through measures)
Practical relevance
During PI planning, teams collect risks that could jeopardize their work in the upcoming program increment—from dependencies and missing resources to technical uncertainties. The risks are then reviewed in a plenary session and jointly assigned to one of the ROAM categories.
Example:
• "Missing test server" → Owned by IT infrastructure team.
• "Feature X is technically uncertain" → Mitigated by spike in Sprint 1.
• "Market launch could be delayed" → Accepted by management.
The result is documented on the program board and reviewed regularly.
Typical misunderstandings
❌ Risks automatically disappear with ROAMing – no, the method only provides clarity, not a solution.
❌ All risks must be resolved – some are deliberately accepted because the cost/benefit ratio of a measure is not appropriate.
❌ Only suitable for SAFe events – the logic can also be applied in projects, portfolios, or management meetings.
Relevance for organizations
ROAMing is particularly helpful in large transformations, because otherwise risks often remain invisible or are tacitly "swept under the carpet."
Use outside of SAFe
The ROAMing mindset can also be applied independently of any framework, e.g.:
• In classic projects, to actively discuss risks as a team rather than just documenting them in Excel spreadsheets.
• In management meetings, to make decisions about accepted risks explicit.
• In startups, to create clear responsibilities for risk management in situations of high uncertainty.
A practical application is, for example, a risk workshop at the end of a quarter, where risks are collected, categorized, and those responsible are named.
Advantages and disadvantages
Advantages
• Simple, clear scheme
• Promotes open communication
• Supports quick decisions
Criticisms:
• Risk of superficiality if discussions are concluded too quickly
• Requires consistent follow-up, otherwise the effect is lost
• No substitute for sound risk management (e.g., assessment, simulations)
CALADE perspective
At CALADE, we use Risk ROAMing as a practical tool for risk transparency, but never in isolation. In our projects, we combine the method with systemic risk management and practical moderation formats so that risks are not only visible but also addressed in a binding manner. The role of experienced facilitators who structure discussions and clarify decision-making processes is important here. This transforms ROAMing from a "piece of paper on the wall" game into a real lever for security and commitment in complex projects.
Related terms
• PI Planning
• Program Board
• Inspect & Adapt Workshop
• Risk Management
• Ownership